 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Baseball Beta Testing » Beta News » Player Rankings
tysonlowery
I'm going to be adding some more to it, hopefully by the end of the night. Including the ability to look at Ratings instead of Stats.
Player Rankings
July 18, 2002 at 02:19AM View BBCode
You can now see how your players stack up against the rest of the league in terms of stats. It goes position by position. Check it out, its under League and its called Player Rankings.I'm going to be adding some more to it, hopefully by the end of the night. Including the ability to look at Ratings instead of Stats.
tysonlowery
July 18, 2002 at 02:38AM View BBCode
I just added Age to these pages, and fixed a bug with the sorts on the pitcher part of it.
tysonlowery
July 18, 2002 at 04:03AM View BBCode
I added in the ability to look at skill ratings in addition to stats. Check it out, its pretty cool.
DougPaz
July 18, 2002 at 07:23AM View BBCode
How come no overall on the ratings rankings? It seems that would be a natural for looking for a player, especially a pitcher. I would like to see that category added.
rickoshea
Doug- love the Ironmen web site...
July 18, 2002 at 07:50PM View BBCode
Love the rankings...Doug- love the Ironmen web site...
tysonlowery
July 18, 2002 at 08:29PM View BBCode
Doug - I meant to put this in, but forgot. I'll get it in soon.
andrew
The overall rankings are a nice addition.
July 18, 2002 at 10:57PM View BBCode
Is there any way that the pitchers could be divided into SP and relievers?The overall rankings are a nice addition.
tysonlowery
For stats, more than half of their games are games started to qualify as a starter?
Anyone have any preferences?
July 18, 2002 at 11:26PM View BBCode
Possibly. For skill ratings C+ Endurance and better is a starter? B- and better?For stats, more than half of their games are games started to qualify as a starter?
Anyone have any preferences?
andrew
July 19, 2002 at 12:15AM View BBCode
I accually haven't noticed any C+ enduance pitchers but that seems like a good cut off.
tysok
Before anyone says something, he was the best pitcher I had last season, he got older and CONSIDERABLY less able to stay in the ball game, I think he's only qualified to get the win 3 or 4 times but has a .84 ERA. :(
July 19, 2002 at 03:45AM View BBCode
I have a C- endurance pitcher pitching for me in the Willie Mays League.Before anyone says something, he was the best pitcher I had last season, he got older and CONSIDERABLY less able to stay in the ball game, I think he's only qualified to get the win 3 or 4 times but has a .84 ERA. :(
andrew
July 19, 2002 at 04:06AM View BBCode
As awsome as he has been (I can vouch for that) I think Michaels is an exception. Not many owners would have enough guts to try him as a SP (including myself) so this should be a rare exception.
Bob
One suggestions -- it would be nice to be able to filter the lists. For example, when looking at catchers, I'm not really interested in seeing some back-up guy who went 3 for 7 and is at the top of the list. It would be helpful to be able to exclude part time players -- perhaps by presenting an option to filter out players who don't qualify for the league lead -- similar to how it works on the current leaders page.
Finally, I agree that it would be nice to separate starters and relievers. For stats, I agree that if more than half their appearances are as a starter, then that's how they would be classified. For starters, I would say C+ endurance or more is a starter. Certainly there are people with C endurance who are starting and there are B+ endurance guys filling a long-relief role, but you've got to draw the line somewhere and I think C+ endurance and above as starters makes sense.
Love this feature
July 19, 2002 at 12:05PM View BBCode
Awesome job, Tyson -- this makes it much easier to research trades, assess your players in an overall league context, etc.One suggestions -- it would be nice to be able to filter the lists. For example, when looking at catchers, I'm not really interested in seeing some back-up guy who went 3 for 7 and is at the top of the list. It would be helpful to be able to exclude part time players -- perhaps by presenting an option to filter out players who don't qualify for the league lead -- similar to how it works on the current leaders page.
Finally, I agree that it would be nice to separate starters and relievers. For stats, I agree that if more than half their appearances are as a starter, then that's how they would be classified. For starters, I would say C+ endurance or more is a starter. Certainly there are people with C endurance who are starting and there are B+ endurance guys filling a long-relief role, but you've got to draw the line somewhere and I think C+ endurance and above as starters makes sense.
hcboomer
July 19, 2002 at 02:59PM View BBCode
C+ endurance seems the right cutoff. Not really important how pitchers are being used on other teams in this context as much as how they CAN be used.
tysonlowery
I added in the RP and SP stuff. It was much easier than I thought, only took a couple minutes.
July 19, 2002 at 03:47PM View BBCode
hcboomer, good point. That is definitely the key.I added in the RP and SP stuff. It was much easier than I thought, only took a couple minutes.
Anonymous
July 19, 2002 at 06:53PM View BBCode
I've said it before, but I'd really like to see OPS listed on the stat pages. Would it be that difficult to implement?
Anonymous
July 19, 2002 at 06:53PM View BBCode
I've said it before, but I'd really like to see OPS listed on the stat pages. Would it be that difficult to implement?
tysonlowery
I'll try to get it in for the next release of the site (next week).
July 19, 2002 at 07:02PM View BBCode
I started this at one point. Let me finish it, I actually thought about it while doing this page and thought that I would have to come back and do OPS.I'll try to get it in for the next release of the site (next week).
andrew
When you select SP and try to sort by another type of stat or ranking (aside from the default, ERA and overall). The selected position goes bact to the default (relief pitchers).
Anyone follow?
Aside from that the player rankings page is awsome
July 20, 2002 at 02:53AM View BBCode
One problem with the player rankings.When you select SP and try to sort by another type of stat or ranking (aside from the default, ERA and overall). The selected position goes bact to the default (relief pitchers).
Anyone follow?
Aside from that the player rankings page is awsome
Bob
July 24, 2002 at 08:26PM View BBCode
Thanks for adding "everyone" and "all outfielders" as pull down selections -- I appreciate the quick response and really love this feature.
tysok
July 26, 2002 at 12:15AM View BBCode
The only thing I saw "wrong" in my opinion is it includes everyone. I think, at least on the stats pages, that it would be better to qualify the stats (3.1 ABs per game, or perhaps at least 1.5 ABs per game...) otherwise this is a very cool add.Pages: 1