January 03, 2003 at 04:42PM View BBCode
How will this affect trades already done during this postseason? Are they still in effect?January 03, 2003 at 05:01PM View BBCode
Good point about the trades. I made two and there was at least one other one made by two other teams.January 03, 2003 at 05:03PM View BBCode
Okay, so what exactly is happening? Is there going to be a draft? Do stats that still exist for '62 get wiped out? Is there an offseason? Is the season going to be in hyper mode? If somebody could lay it out, that would be helpful.January 03, 2003 at 06:47PM View BBCode
The only thing that will happen is that 162 games will be played. There won't be a draft. If you made any trades, you will have those players for the 1962 season.January 03, 2003 at 07:42PM View BBCode
Sorry, but here's another question I just thought about now. Will minor leaguers get improvements the same way through the phantom '62 season? If so, seems like they will get some extra benefit -- not that that's a bad thing -- getting two seasons worth of improvements for one actual season.January 03, 2003 at 07:55PM View BBCode
That's a good point Keith. But I think that if it looks like it would be hard to turn off the improvements (since it seemed hard to do for the World Series), then it wouldn't be that bad if they just get the points all over again. At least it would be a lot less detrimental to the overall game than having a mass retirement and the loss of a year of improvement for the young Major League players.January 03, 2003 at 08:05PM View BBCode
what about the people who Do have 1962 stats? Are the previous ones going to be wiped out or will they accumulate as 1963 stats? Will there be a postseason?January 03, 2003 at 08:42PM View BBCode
On the minor-league stuff, I agree it really isn't much of a problem. Frankly I was curious only because I wondered if I should bring up my guys with coaching points and let them play a full hyper season instead. After all, since the Steamroller will remain the "official" 1962 champions, I guess I could experiment in the hyper season.January 03, 2003 at 11:14PM View BBCode
I thought of another problem. Since I deleted the guys stats records, I have to re-add the stats records for stats to accumulate. This will take a lot of time as well.January 03, 2003 at 11:18PM View BBCode
So go for it! But won't you STILL have to add stats records for those players? As much as I hate to say it, maybe it'll be a better idea to gas the league and wait to start a new until some of the new changes are in place.January 03, 2003 at 11:26PM View BBCode
I think I'm losing track of the pros and cons in all of this. If we're just eliminating the offseason and going on to '63, that makes perfect sense if those retirements can be prevented. If we're running the offseason without retirements, then I guess the only real problem would be a steeper decline for those plus 33 guys who don't have any stats? Seems like most all the guys who would still be young enough to improve still have their '62 stats.January 03, 2003 at 11:26PM View BBCode
I agree that maybe it would just be better to start a new league. I wanted to see how Brad's children did but I think it's safe to say that we would have become a powerhouse. If that's easier, just do it.January 03, 2003 at 11:36PM View BBCode
Whoa, some strange stuff happening over there on the standings page. Something tells me we're witnessing the final death knell of Beta League II.January 04, 2003 at 12:43AM View BBCode
I've gone ahead and set my preferences for an initial draft. I'm sure Tyson will let us know what's going on but just in case anyone isn't at a computer this weekend they might want to do the same.January 04, 2003 at 06:33AM View BBCode
Yeah, the one guy on my Major League team that had lost stats, Has not been accumulating stats for whatever has been going on, and it seems that everyone (pitcher included), have been getting the stats from whatever is going on now, added to what they had from last season. It seems that he is playing though, but for some reason, jsut doesn't have stats. Is it possible that the stats for 1962 (A) were not deleted, and 1962 (B) got started early? (maybe a "misclick" of the mouse?) Because I thought Tyson said he would post the schedule, but maybe he just got too busy and forgot.January 04, 2003 at 07:46PM View BBCode
Sadly, it is starting to look more and more like my painful rebuilding process will not ever come to fruition.
January 04, 2003 at 08:12PM View BBCode
You can jump off your high horse there Rick...just a simple random draft order should be fine for everyone...don't believe your own hype.January 05, 2003 at 01:53AM View BBCode
LOL, I have to agree with geoffrey13 as well. It is not like there is even an advantage to having the first pick. In fact I would rather have the #16 and 17 pick then the #1 and 32 pick.January 05, 2003 at 01:59AM View BBCode
HAHAHA, I would too, maybe that's what Rick was getting at...:DJanuary 05, 2003 at 02:24AM View BBCode
I think Rick was just being an egotistical jerk. :DJanuary 05, 2003 at 04:36AM View BBCode
Nice to see the old Jeff we know and love hasn't gone away...January 05, 2003 at 04:48AM View formatted
January 05, 2003 at 04:57AM View BBCode
What Dynasty League (if any) are you in anyways? Other than Beta of course.January 05, 2003 at 06:25AM View BBCode
Wow, we've really come full circle.