 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Sim Forums » Other Comments » probably uninteresting potential anomaly
paulcaraccio
probably uninteresting potential anomaly
March 13, 2013 at 11:43PM View BBCode
In my career playing this game, I've won 28 postseason series, and exactly 0 of them have been sweeps. Isn't that odd...
maxthesax
March 15, 2013 at 04:15PM View formatted
You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
I believe that SD treats the postseason similar to a late inning - in order to keep things interesting. In following the Dom DiMaggio league for close to 40 seasons, I've only seen a sweep twice.
tworoosters
A) starting pitchers who are tired are left in the game
B) RPs are generally not as good as SPs
Playoff series tend to go more than 4 games because:
A) Both teams are likely 90+ game winners with very good line ups and pitching therefore the likelihood of one team winning four in a row are limited.
There is no ABE conspiracy involved in either scenario, unless one of bundy's teams are involved then all bets are off.
March 15, 2013 at 04:34PM View BBCode
More runs are scored in late innings because:A) starting pitchers who are tired are left in the game
B) RPs are generally not as good as SPs
Playoff series tend to go more than 4 games because:
A) Both teams are likely 90+ game winners with very good line ups and pitching therefore the likelihood of one team winning four in a row are limited.
There is no ABE conspiracy involved in either scenario, unless one of bundy's teams are involved then all bets are off.
paulcaraccio
March 15, 2013 at 05:34PM View BBCode
well i've been the victim of 4 or 5 sweeps, so I know they're real :spin:Pages: 1