October 19, 2004 at 01:32PM View BBCode
I just kicked off the draft code. Let me know your thoughts on how things turned out and your thoughts on the process. I think this system will be an improvement over the old way of doing things.October 19, 2004 at 02:58PM View BBCode
I really like the idea of being able to see where you will draft what position. It gives things more of a sense of balance I think. Maybe what I'm trying to say is more control over who is being drafted.October 19, 2004 at 03:51PM View BBCode
I think that the draft went well, from what I can see so far. In the future I think I should spend some more time on the lower round picks instead of just focusing on the first two.October 19, 2004 at 05:12PM View BBCode
Draft went smoothly.October 19, 2004 at 05:43PM View BBCode
Hi Casey - you kind of have control over this if you want it. You could set your prefs so that players over 25 aren't selected after the 3rd round for position players, or after the 6th round for pitchers.October 19, 2004 at 06:14PM View BBCode
...you kind of have control over this if you want it. You could set your prefs so that players over 25 aren't selected after the 3rd round for position players, or after the 6th round for pitchers.
I'm not sure if putting that restriction on teams would be a good thing. I could see it causing some grief with some owners.
I think what you are saying is that teams shouldn't be able to horde older players in the minors right from the start, is that right? There might be some other ways around that one - including a change in logic for retirements.
Something I never looked at - how did Abe do in terms of placing players on your major and minor league teams? Or setting the initial lineup? I should now be able to make this better since all teams are guaranteed to have the right number of players.
October 19, 2004 at 06:20PM View BBCode
I think I can improve the lineup stuff. I will try to work on this tomorrow and we can re-run the draft this week.October 19, 2004 at 07:31PM View BBCode
Veterans(say 30 or older) in the minors should/could be retired if they don't have a set number of plate appearances. It could be 25, 50 or even 75 or it could be a set number of games appeared in. This would certainly encourage owners to trade them (to get something for them) as opposed to hording them.October 19, 2004 at 09:28PM View BBCode
ABE made some terrible judgement by putting a 27 y.o. B+ SP in the minors, while leaving one B SP and two B relievers in the Brooklyn majors. I can't even get him into the majors unless I put one of the other guys on Options and and surely lose him to another team.October 19, 2004 at 09:43PM View BBCode
Mike - I was hoping it would put the players selected top 5 at SP in the majors, last 4 SP in the minors. Did it work out differently?October 19, 2004 at 10:57PM View BBCode
The draft was fine for me. The only problems can be attributed to my bad preferences. This system as it stands is an improvement, at least it is to meOctober 19, 2004 at 11:35PM View BBCode
This was a better, more evenly-distributed draft than the previous one. I concur with Mike that there should be an amnesty period after a league's initial draft for promotions and demotions.October 20, 2004 at 12:02AM View BBCode
This draft worked out a lot better for me than the last one. I'm quite happy with how things went. Not much youth in my minors but I didn't spend a lot of time setting my lower preferences.October 20, 2004 at 03:34AM View BBCode
I never received an e-mail message the draft had been run.October 20, 2004 at 02:27PM View BBCode
I deliberately went with ABE's settings and only tweaked a couple of positions. I came out with a pitching staff that is strong but very old, even with relatively high youth settings. Also, my minor leaguers are old older, no teens. I guess the bottom line is that if you want some very young players to develop, you have to move them up on the list. Default settings won't get you there. I thought the draft ran fairly and the right players generally landed in the majors/minors. I didn't know the draft had run so the batting order was the usual C, C, 1B, 1B, etc., with many starters sitting out the first series.October 20, 2004 at 03:07PM View BBCode
RSS - I went through it with some owners a while ago on why there shouldn't be an amnesty period after the initial draft. The basic argument is that just because Abe put a guy on your major league team that you want in the minors, doesn't mean you should be able to stash that guy in the minors indefinitely. If someone else wants to use those players in the major leagues, they should be allowed to.October 20, 2004 at 03:45PM View BBCode
If we draft a 27 year old SP ahead of a 35 year old pitcher in the 5th and 6th spots, then the 35 year old would go to the minors. In order to get him to the majors we would have to put the 27 year old on Options. There may be no other way to get the 35 year old into the Majors, and it just doesn't seem right for that to happen in an initial draft.October 20, 2004 at 04:21PM View BBCode
But think about it. If you drafted the 27 year old in the 5th round, you had him ranked higher than the 35 year old you drafted in the 6th round. Why would you want to play the inferior player?Pages: 1