August 04, 2017 at 03:14PM View BBCode
So with some feedback from you I have put together I format for the Hall going forward.August 04, 2017 at 04:58PM View BBCode
This seems fair. Thanks to Pecker and Kingturtle for their work so far and their continued efforts.August 04, 2017 at 06:52PM View BBCode
Yes every other year and remember if there are more than 10 nominees then the weaker of the nominees will fall off. If they are a weaker candidate and have been on there before then the newer and stronger candidate will replace them. If we limit it to 10 or less then owners can really study who deserves it. Having more than that makes it real tough to look through all of the candidates and could be really time consuming.August 04, 2017 at 07:22PM View BBCode
Hmmm. But then it's not really a 5 year limit. I think it makes more sense that once you are up for vote, you can't drop off in favor of a "stronger" candidate, unless you get less than X % of the vote/hit five years without being inducted.August 04, 2017 at 09:10PM View BBCode
It's 5 times. You can be up for vote 5 total times. They don't have to be consecutive years.August 04, 2017 at 09:47PM View BBCode
Ohhh, ok. Interesting method.August 05, 2017 at 12:53AM View BBCode
I'd like to suggest a few tweaks...August 05, 2017 at 01:14AM View BBCode
All great ideas. Let's see how this works and we will make adjustments if needed after a couple of rounds of this. The reason why I don't like the 15% rule is because if we have a very strong class of candidates then the bottom of those top players may not get to 15% since they are will judged based on that class. It's not right, but it's human nature. If we have more than 10 really strong candidates then we can always go higher if we need. After all nothing is ever set in stone.August 05, 2017 at 07:23PM View BBCode
Well, we can make it 10% then. The owner is likely to vote for the player he or she nominated. So that's 1 in 10. If it winds up being 1 vote out of 11, then the guy is out. Such a circumstance would mean that 10 other owners voted no, and not a single owner other than the nominator voted yes. That's pretty resounding.August 05, 2017 at 08:55PM View BBCode
Let's put it this way. At 10%, all a player needs is the nominating owner to vote yes if there are 10 or less owners voting. All a player needs is the nominating owner and you to vote yes if there are 11 to 20 owners voting. If a player only gets 2 votes and there are more than 20 owners voting, well I think that player isn't worthy of another chance.August 05, 2017 at 09:40PM View BBCode
Since you are really selling this pretty hard then it's not going to hurt to implement that. We will roll with the 10% rule.August 06, 2017 at 01:13AM View BBCode
Thanks. I assure you, it will be helpful :)August 06, 2017 at 01:34AM View BBCode
It would be nice to start the call for nominations the day after the end of the World Series. That time of "year" can get a little boring.August 06, 2017 at 02:49AM View BBCode
I like the tweak. I agree with Turtle. OS takes a couple of days anyway.Pages: 1