January 22, 2016 at 01:12PM View BBCode
Hi,January 22, 2016 at 01:16PM View BBCode
Yes, that seems to be best for the league.....although I'd say we are on borrowed time!January 22, 2016 at 01:41PM View BBCode
I'm just a chaperon, but it would probably be best to drop down to 16January 22, 2016 at 02:07PM View BBCode
I'm the chaperone for the Cincinnati team. Not sure if my vote counts, but that seems like a good idea to cut back to 16 teams for this league.January 22, 2016 at 02:09PM View BBCode
I joined because this was a 24 team league... But having 1/3 of the league Bots is definitely not good. I agree that reducing to 16 teams is in everyone's best interest. I vote yes.January 22, 2016 at 03:42PM View BBCode
Somehow, I'm just a chaperon, but it would probably be best to drop down to 16January 22, 2016 at 07:00PM View BBCode
Among the 9 unowned teams, I'd say Colorado is in best shape. The owner contacted me and said he would keep the team, so we have 16 human owners in the new league.January 22, 2016 at 07:01PM View BBCode
I also joined because it was 24 teams but I agree with cutting back to 16January 22, 2016 at 07:19PM View BBCode
It makes a lot of sense to pair the league down to 16 teams. It would be a lot easier to find one new owner as opposed to nine.January 22, 2016 at 09:26PM View BBCode
Originally posted by Frunobulax
Please vote, yes or no.
January 22, 2016 at 10:18PM View BBCode
I'd say downsize is the best option. And I'm not a chaperone but was going give my team up to facilitate things. I need to cut back anyway.January 23, 2016 at 01:43AM View BBCode
Also if needed I can move to American League when this happens.January 23, 2016 at 08:31AM View BBCode
I'll ask admin to do it.Pages: 1 2