April 07, 2014 at 04:41PM View BBCode
How does the AI determine when a 3-4 D will be played? I don't see any settings for it beyond the depth chart. Thanks.April 08, 2014 at 12:27AM View BBCode
I haven't done anything with it yet, it is just in the database. There are some kinks I have to work out before I can install any strategies that use it.April 08, 2014 at 12:58AM View BBCode
Will it be possible to turn off either the 4-3 or 3-4?April 08, 2014 at 01:44AM View BBCode
I am not a big LB guy.. the thought of having 4 of them on the field scares me. :oApril 08, 2014 at 02:08AM View BBCode
Originally posted by RichNYC1
I am not a big LB guy.. the thought of having 4 of them on the field scares me. :o
April 08, 2014 at 02:57AM View BBCode
Originally posted by blakjakshalak
I would prefer being able to designate my base defense as one or the other rather than have the sim decide.
April 08, 2014 at 02:40PM View BBCode
Yes, with the lack of DE's in the premium leagues and the high number of DTs, I think putting a 3-4 together would be slightly easier. However in a Goal Line Situation I would want a 4-3 in order to maximize the Defensive push.April 08, 2014 at 05:10PM View BBCode
Originally posted by dirtdevil
Originally posted by blakjakshalak
I would prefer being able to designate my base defense as one or the other rather than have the sim decide.
when we get there, I would agree. if we can also designate specific times to use the non 'base' alignment, then great. but i'd much rather be stuck with one that I choose rather than have the sim choose between two randomly without my input.
April 09, 2014 at 06:08AM View BBCode
Originally posted by blakjakshalak
If the same set of defensive plays were available using the 3-4 alignment, an owner could choose for themselves how much and in what situation to use them. Or they can leave them unselected.
April 11, 2014 at 04:27PM View BBCode
I am also looking to add a 6-2 for short yardage or goal line situations, which will probably require me to crate a Defensive Guard role for the two innermost linemen, which I think should populate from the ILB depth chart rather than the DT depth chart (if the owner doesn't specify DG's for the formation). I'm torn about this though, because logically they should be DT's. I guess I should look at who NFL teams actually slot into those two innermost lineman spots on short yardage defenses.April 11, 2014 at 04:41PM View BBCode
Normally I believe its more like LDE, RDT, NT, LDT, LE. For a 5 man front, I think the 6 man would fall on the strong side between the DT and the End and be a MLB.April 11, 2014 at 04:45PM View BBCode
I have no clue but my gut says get the most amount of big men on that front 6 as possible, which is why I'm thinking either a DT or DE, not MLB.April 11, 2014 at 05:51PM View BBCode
Originally posted by Admin
For the short term, though, deciding who your "starters" are will still be based on a 4-3
April 11, 2014 at 05:58PM View BBCode
Originally posted by casperthegm
I have no clue but my gut says get the most amount of big men on that front 6 as possible, which is why I'm thinking either a DT or DE, not MLB.
April 11, 2014 at 06:29PM View BBCode
I'd prefer a line of Fatties as well, preferably strong fatties, but as we have no way of knowing how big a guy is, I'd prefer to base it on a skill set, mainly strength, run cover, and tackle. With a 6 man front agility is pointless. Default to 2 DE and 4 DTs, but everyone will still tweak it.April 11, 2014 at 06:48PM View BBCode
Good question about the offensive set for goal line. Shouldn't really have a defensive set and not one for the other side. I'd love to see a jumbo set for offense with the ability to have a bootleg.April 12, 2014 at 04:51AM View BBCode
About the 3-4, what are you exactly expecting to happen?April 12, 2014 at 05:04AM View BBCode
About the 6-2 formation... am I right in thinking that a play action would/should work wonders against it?April 12, 2014 at 02:38PM View BBCode
Originally posted by Hodor
About the 6-2 formation... am I right in thinking that a play action would/should work wonders against it?
In case the answer is not, then why not? if you're stacking the box is clear that you're trying to stop the run, you don't really care about the backfield (=not enough QB pressure), so there's a huge chance for a play action to succeed.
Also, if there isn't a mirror offensive formation, then there's no way you can succeed with a regular running play against a 6-2 formation. Everybody will be forced to pass in goal line situations (I mean forced, not willingly going with it for the pleasure of doing weird things).
Pages: 1