June 24, 2004 at 04:28PM View BBCode
It should be more or less ready to go now. I added some other things in, like showing you how many claims a particular player has.June 24, 2004 at 04:39PM View BBCode
when you say you will allow the players to rest, do you mean sending them down to the minors, if so i wish you would reconsider, maybe implent some pinh hitting logic where the players could sit on teh bench and you can go through the logic and say never allow player X to pinch hit, etc. It is just extremly unrealistic, i have never seen the yankees send down jeter, giambi, mussina to the minors to rest for the playoffs, and the pitchers never stop pitching, they might alter the rotation a bit for the final weeks, but they never have them stop pitching in games.June 24, 2004 at 05:38PM View BBCode
Rest means you could specify that a player can stay in the majors and not play in games - it would be an improvement over the current pseudo-system that teams employ by sending guys to the minors. Kind of like the Yankees do the last week of the season so Jeter is rested for the playoffs and doesn't get injured.June 24, 2004 at 05:40PM View BBCode
Actually, now that I have gotten into this, I am thinking about doing the following instead.June 24, 2004 at 06:01PM View BBCode
your 2nd idea sounds great, and the 1st idea is good too. Can't wait to see this implemented!June 24, 2004 at 11:12PM View BBCode
Question: How does this apply to Pitchers, since their no backup pool except in the minors.June 25, 2004 at 04:22AM View BBCode
A note on the "number of claims" option: A freshly-designated guy shows 1 claim; this is presumably the auto-claim to the minors, but nothing shows up under Pending Claims, which seems slightly unintuitive. Then, when I try to reclaim him to the majors, he shows as having two claims pending, and the claim to the majors shows up on the claims list.June 25, 2004 at 04:25PM View BBCode
Jack - that's a good point, I think that is why in that previous post I thought about allowing you to call up replacements for the pitchers (I had forgotten why I suggested that). Let me try to get that going.June 25, 2004 at 05:45PM View BBCode
I did it again. I tried to send down a player to the Minors (Blackie Hohman), and I lost him to the Waiver wire instead. The color coding is not good enough. We really should have a warning.June 25, 2004 at 05:50PM View BBCode
Was thinking the color coding should be more pronounced on the promote/demote screen - is that the one you were using? Or was it on the depth chart? I try to avoid adding in extra JavaScript on pages where I can since it can be so finicky.June 25, 2004 at 09:22PM View BBCode
I'm not seeing what's happening, but I strongly agree with Mike that color coding is not enough, and if at all possible there should be an explicit intermediate message/page with a confirmation request of any move that puts one of your players "on assignment" to the waiver wire. Not least among the reasons is that some people are color-blind. And some people just make mistakes. Also, don't you lose your 1 re-claim for your player for that season if you reclaim a guy after such an accidental assignment?June 28, 2004 at 02:13PM View BBCode
Originally posted by tysonlowery
I added some more color to promote/demote screen.
June 28, 2004 at 03:33PM View BBCode
I think I'm out of room on this page, hence the use of colors to denote this. I'll get some javascript warnings on the page for you guys.June 28, 2004 at 03:46PM View BBCode
Tyson,June 28, 2004 at 07:32PM View BBCode
I added the code to put that in the news after the fact. It should work now - at least last time I tested. When was this guy waived, do you remember?June 29, 2004 at 01:10AM View BBCode
Chris - I fixed the bug so that it should show the correct number of claims.June 29, 2004 at 05:53PM View BBCode
Tyson, the transaction is reported on the card of Nate Kores (who I brought up at the time). It was done on 6-11-55.Pages: 1