 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Sim Forums » Football Game & Site Questions » Execution
PatriotFan78blitz
Instead I see many team owners exploiting the game by picking under educated players by the bunches to role the dice on a maximum gain pass once every 4 downs.
Team owners passing up the players who have a good grasp of the concepts of the game for sub par to Neanderthal like receivers who are really fast and can catch. Most teams who experiencing a leak of yardage defensively to these such players would make an adjustment quickly and stop the bleed.
Defensive Backs with higher Exe should be able to respond to these speed demons with better techniques. After it's all said and done yes speed is important. I would prefer to believe that the smarter team would prevail 8 out of 10 times.
I'm willing to totally say Exe isn't everything and will hear any argument for Spd over Exe.
This is not a foot race. I believe the receiver can outrun a CB. I do not believe a receiver can outrun time. Unless the receiver is catching the defense rope a dope style in the fourth quarter he will be figured out and adjusted to.
In the NFL there are very few receivers who catch more than 2
40 yard passes a game. This isn't a fact, and I would love to see stats suggesting otherwise. Just what I have observed in 20+ years of watching pro sports.
Execution
July 05, 2013 at 02:31AM View BBCode
First let me say this game is confusing me on the Execution level. I fail to understand how any position can be successful in a team sport that relies on team Execution without most parts of that team having at the least a B rating.Instead I see many team owners exploiting the game by picking under educated players by the bunches to role the dice on a maximum gain pass once every 4 downs.
Team owners passing up the players who have a good grasp of the concepts of the game for sub par to Neanderthal like receivers who are really fast and can catch. Most teams who experiencing a leak of yardage defensively to these such players would make an adjustment quickly and stop the bleed.
Defensive Backs with higher Exe should be able to respond to these speed demons with better techniques. After it's all said and done yes speed is important. I would prefer to believe that the smarter team would prevail 8 out of 10 times.
I'm willing to totally say Exe isn't everything and will hear any argument for Spd over Exe.
This is not a foot race. I believe the receiver can outrun a CB. I do not believe a receiver can outrun time. Unless the receiver is catching the defense rope a dope style in the fourth quarter he will be figured out and adjusted to.
In the NFL there are very few receivers who catch more than 2
40 yard passes a game. This isn't a fact, and I would love to see stats suggesting otherwise. Just what I have observed in 20+ years of watching pro sports.
Roaddog
Execution.
July 07, 2013 at 09:09AM View BBCode
Ok, based on your rambling post, I gather you don't think there is enough of a penalty for low execution. Well, my response is based on my experience with my, relatively talented, but low execution team. There is a substantial penalty, but it is worse for some positions. You don't want a low execution QB (bad, just bad), CB (lots of pass interference), DL (offside all the time), or especially OL (kill too many drives with penalties). I have an otherwise good LT that is a penalty machine (one per game). WR? Yeah, I agree, does not seem to matter much (or any other rating for that matter). I don't think WR ratings matter enough. Almost any B+ WR will work OK, it is mostly about the QB. I have gotten good production with B rated WR, regardless of execution. Would love to hear from more experienced owners on this subject.
Hodor
Semantics.
"Execution" in the game doesn't necessarily means what you're thinking it should mean.
In here, "execution" is the catch-all rating for very specific skills that are not included in the main skills for that position.
i.e, the QB ability to pick up a blitz and find a receiver in a rush, the ability of almost any player to avoid penalties, the WR ability to catch those passes that are almost impossible to catch, and so on.
That's it.
It doesn't mean how good that player "executes" everything, or a player with non-existant "execution" in the game are uneducated or below neanderthal knowledge on the concepts of the game.
It just means that those players will make more penalties or won't make that extra great play that other players might do.
If your secondary is getting torched often, then get faster backs.
If you don't see those things in the NFL is because teams are more leveled in every aspect.
Also, it's not necessarily speed, but conditioning.
A tired player becomes almost useless against a fresh player.
If a team is resting his best WRs in many downs and only using them when they really need, there's a big chance that the other team CBs that have been playing every single down won't have a chance to catch them up.
Adjusting your settings so your best players are fresh when you need them, usually is a smarter thing to do, and those teams usually prevail, not sure if 8 out of 10 times, but I'm sure that more often than not they prevail.
Imho, Oline and WRs matter as much as QB
July 07, 2013 at 12:44PM View BBCode
Originally posted by PatriotFan78blitz
First let me say this game is confusing me on the Execution level. I fail to understand how any position can be successful in a team sport that relies on team Execution without most parts of that team having at the least a B rating.
Semantics.
"Execution" in the game doesn't necessarily means what you're thinking it should mean.
In here, "execution" is the catch-all rating for very specific skills that are not included in the main skills for that position.
i.e, the QB ability to pick up a blitz and find a receiver in a rush, the ability of almost any player to avoid penalties, the WR ability to catch those passes that are almost impossible to catch, and so on.
That's it.
It doesn't mean how good that player "executes" everything, or a player with non-existant "execution" in the game are uneducated or below neanderthal knowledge on the concepts of the game.
It just means that those players will make more penalties or won't make that extra great play that other players might do.
Originally posted by PatriotFan78blitzInstead I see many team owners exploiting the game by picking under educated players by the bunches to role the dice on a maximum gain pass once every 4 downs.
Team owners passing up the players who have a good grasp of the concepts of the game for sub par to Neanderthal like receivers who are really fast and can catch. Most teams who experiencing a leak of yardage defensively to these such players would make an adjustment quickly and stop the bleed.
Defensive Backs with higher Exe should be able to respond to these speed demons with better techniques. After it's all said and done yes speed is important. I would prefer to believe that the smarter team would prevail 8 out of 10 times.
I'm willing to totally say Exe isn't everything and will hear any argument for Spd over Exe.
This is not a foot race. I believe the receiver can outrun a CB. I do not believe a receiver can outrun time. Unless the receiver is catching the defense rope a dope style in the fourth quarter he will be figured out and adjusted to.
In the NFL there are very few receivers who catch more than 2
40 yard passes a game. This isn't a fact, and I would love to see stats suggesting otherwise. Just what I have observed in 20+ years of watching pro sports.
If your secondary is getting torched often, then get faster backs.
If you don't see those things in the NFL is because teams are more leveled in every aspect.
Also, it's not necessarily speed, but conditioning.
A tired player becomes almost useless against a fresh player.
If a team is resting his best WRs in many downs and only using them when they really need, there's a big chance that the other team CBs that have been playing every single down won't have a chance to catch them up.
Adjusting your settings so your best players are fresh when you need them, usually is a smarter thing to do, and those teams usually prevail, not sure if 8 out of 10 times, but I'm sure that more often than not they prevail.
Originally posted by Roaddog
Ok, based on your rambling post, I gather you don't think there is enough of a penalty for low execution. Well, my response is based on my experience with my, relatively talented, but low execution team. There is a substantial penalty, but it is worse for some positions. You don't want a low execution QB (bad, just bad), CB (lots of pass interference), DL (offside all the time), or especially OL (kill too many drives with penalties). I have an otherwise good LT that is a penalty machine (one per game). WR? Yeah, I agree, does not seem to matter much (or any other rating for that matter). I don't think WR ratings matter enough. Almost any B+ WR will work OK, it is mostly about the QB. I have gotten good production with B rated WR, regardless of execution.
Imho, Oline and WRs matter as much as QB
Pages: 1