 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Baseball Beta Testing » Short Term League Talk » After Twenty Five (25) Consecutive Wins...
thatrogue
After Twenty Five (25) Consecutive Wins...
February 13, 2013 at 10:45AM View BBCode
...[url=http://beta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?id=9807587]Art Swann[/url] suffers [url=http://beta.simdynasty.com/boxscore.jsp?boxscoreid=80054&cityid=13]its first loss of the 2011 season[/url].
tworoosters
Not to diminish Mr. Swann's achievements but [url=http://beta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?mode=player&playername=nobody&id=9809001]Breckinridge[/url] is 16-1 and I could have 10 of him plus a [url=http://beta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?player=nobody&mode=stats&id=9807589]a .300 hitter[/url] for the price of Swann .
February 13, 2013 at 08:54PM View BBCode
It's the freakin' ASL.Not to diminish Mr. Swann's achievements but [url=http://beta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?mode=player&playername=nobody&id=9809001]Breckinridge[/url] is 16-1 and I could have 10 of him plus a [url=http://beta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?player=nobody&mode=stats&id=9807589]a .300 hitter[/url] for the price of Swann .
thatrogue
February 15, 2013 at 09:34AM View BBCode
True, but having a turdy turdface is what makes it fun.
tworoosters
February 22, 2013 at 09:04PM View BBCode
To me having a poor bastard like Brackinridge playing for less than a million bucks and going 19-2 with a sub 2.00 ERA is what's really fun.
thatrogue
February 23, 2013 at 10:07PM View BBCode
Originally posted by tworoostersSo why don't you? LOL :lol:
It's the freakin' ASL.
Not to diminish Mr. Swann's achievements but [url=http://beta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?mode=player&playername=nobody&id=9809001]Breckinridge[/url] is 16-1 and I could have 10 of him plus a [url=http://beta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?player=nobody&mode=stats&id=9807589]a .300 hitter[/url] for the price of Swann .
tm4559
February 24, 2013 at 09:10PM View BBCode
he just talks about this stuff. it doesn't actuals happen.
tworoosters
My point was more about the insanity of this league, specifically, and the ridiculous over payment I saw for SPs in real salary leagues. When a player commands almost 12% of your payroll cap he damn well better produce, especially when he only appears in 22% of your games.
Brackenridge turned his game up a notch this year, going 23-1..........for just over 1% of his team's payroll cap .
March 03, 2013 at 05:52PM View BBCode
I was speaking t h e o r e t i c a l l y (talking slow acuz, you know, big word), obviously there are not 10 players of Brackenridge's magnificent skill level available, or I'm just too damn lazy to find them.My point was more about the insanity of this league, specifically, and the ridiculous over payment I saw for SPs in real salary leagues. When a player commands almost 12% of your payroll cap he damn well better produce, especially when he only appears in 22% of your games.
Brackenridge turned his game up a notch this year, going 23-1..........for just over 1% of his team's payroll cap .
thatrogue
(In reality, it would be interesting to see how such a team would fare in the playoffs, considering the kind of offense one could assemble using such a plan. It would probably take a few seasons to assemble, but it would be a fun experiment.)
[Edited on 3-4-2013 by thatrogue]
March 04, 2013 at 01:58PM View BBCode
Originally posted by tworoostersConsidering the number of low-cost, high performing pitchers in the league (I typically have two or three of them myself), I suggest the bolded section has more to do with it. ;)
I was speaking t h e o r e t i c a l l y (talking slow acuz, you know, big word), obviously there are not 10 players of Brackenridge's magnificent skill level available, or I'm just too...lazy to find them.
(In reality, it would be interesting to see how such a team would fare in the playoffs, considering the kind of offense one could assemble using such a plan. It would probably take a few seasons to assemble, but it would be a fun experiment.)
Originally posted by tworoostersYeah...the real salary leagues are tough to manage considering the insane bidding for pitchers and stud hitters. Interestingly, in the KBL, we've started to see far fewer of the $15 - $20M bids for top talent. Thus, we've had at least three-to-four teams compete in the NL for much of the season, recently...as a level of parity has started to emerge.
My point was more about the insanity of this league, specifically, and the ridiculous over payment I saw for SPs in real salary leagues. When a player commands almost 12% of your payroll cap he damn well better produce, especially when he only appears in 22% of your games.
Brackenridge turned his game up a notch this year, going 23-1..........for just over 1% of his team's payroll cap .
[Edited on 3-4-2013 by thatrogue]
thatrogue
March 04, 2013 at 02:00PM View BBCode
PS: I think we'll do another round of HOF voting in the GNL soon.
tm4559
if only it were physically sick, in sufficient magnitude to succumb and die.
March 04, 2013 at 02:43PM View BBCode
Originally posted by tworoosters
My point was more about the insanity of this league,
if only it were physically sick, in sufficient magnitude to succumb and die.
tworoosters
I know that in MLB occasionally players coming off less than perfect situations will sign one year deals to "prove" themselves, Adrian Beltre's stint in Boston being a recent example, but in the sim players will just keep signing one year deals.
I also think that bids should only be visible if your team has bid on the player in question, and that teams should have a limit on the number of free agents they can bid on.
These two ideas would stop the "poach" bid, where a team with no previous interest in Player A knows that Player A has a top bid of $4M so they bid $6M, on a one year deal of course, and grab him. The second part would stop teams from bidding the league minimum on everyone just to see what the bids are.
March 04, 2013 at 03:53PM View BBCode
One of the major reasons I left the KBL was that I just can't stand the "one year contract" bonus that the SIM offers.I know that in MLB occasionally players coming off less than perfect situations will sign one year deals to "prove" themselves, Adrian Beltre's stint in Boston being a recent example, but in the sim players will just keep signing one year deals.
I also think that bids should only be visible if your team has bid on the player in question, and that teams should have a limit on the number of free agents they can bid on.
These two ideas would stop the "poach" bid, where a team with no previous interest in Player A knows that Player A has a top bid of $4M so they bid $6M, on a one year deal of course, and grab him. The second part would stop teams from bidding the league minimum on everyone just to see what the bids are.
Pages: 1