 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Football Beta Testing » Football Beta Test Discussion » auto waive
lancereisen
The rookie has promise and improves, the older player is on his way out.
auto waive
September 06, 2012 at 03:42PM View BBCode
Please look into auto-waiving older, better players in the reserve squad before the new draft picks. I was unable to get online yesterday and my 4th rounder, who I drafted as a KR, got waived (and immediately snapped up). A superior 29-30 year old player should have been waived; I could probably get him back if I needed.The rookie has promise and improves, the older player is on his way out.
nhat8121
like this? or you have a better way than the current system without creating loopholes after loopholes?
September 06, 2012 at 08:07PM View BBCode
if superior, bench, 29-30 age = waived vs younger players?????like this? or you have a better way than the current system without creating loopholes after loopholes?
tworoosters
September 06, 2012 at 08:32PM View BBCode
Auto waive has to work by simply waiving the lowest rated players off the inactive roster, an owners inactivity is unfortunate but AFE has to go by the numbers.
Admin
Chris
September 06, 2012 at 11:30PM View BBCode
No mater how I do it someone will be unhappy. If there's anything to be done here, it might be to take Best Role into account rather than just overall rating, as fullbacks and special teams players are particularly vulnerable.Chris
RichNYC1
I think thats a good idea, Chris.
September 07, 2012 at 01:50AM View BBCode
Originally posted by Admin
No mater how I do it someone will be unhappy. If there's anything to be done here, it might be to take Best Role into account rather than just overall rating, as fullbacks and special teams players are particularly vulnerable.
Chris
I think thats a good idea, Chris.
lancereisen
Execution is a factor. Fabe values it more across the board, where as I devalue it except for defensive backfield and QB, where I hope it's important; and maybe it helps at RB, WR. (I would think it highly important for route running, but can't tell.)
On OL/DL players, EXE seems to often be inversely proportional:lol: to AGL.
September 07, 2012 at 03:32PM View BBCode
I like that idea, Chris, this was a KR.Execution is a factor. Fabe values it more across the board, where as I devalue it except for defensive backfield and QB, where I hope it's important; and maybe it helps at RB, WR. (I would think it highly important for route running, but can't tell.)
On OL/DL players, EXE seems to often be inversely proportional:lol: to AGL.
RichNYC1
I agree about EXE in the defensive backfield and at LB. It should play more of a factor on the OL, where I dont think it has much, if any, influence.
September 07, 2012 at 07:22PM View BBCode
Originally posted by lancereisen
Execution is a factor. Fabe values it more across the board, where as I devalue it except for defensive backfield and QB, where I hope it's important; and maybe it helps at RB, WR. (I would think it highly important for route running, but can't tell.)
On OL/DL players, EXE seems to often be inversely proportional:lol: to AGL.
I agree about EXE in the defensive backfield and at LB. It should play more of a factor on the OL, where I dont think it has much, if any, influence.
Pages: 1