September 19, 2011 at 04:22AM View BBCode
Just read the most recent trade complaint, which DOESN'T involve me and you absolutely have to be kidding. There is nothing at all wrong with that deal. One of our owners needs to leave the league or find something else to do with his time. Absolutely censored .September 19, 2011 at 05:47PM View BBCode
Is this the NYN - CHA trade? If so, I tend to agree with the complainant.September 19, 2011 at 06:07PM View BBCode
Hey that's no mid-range first round pick. Maybe 15th or 16th :P. And the prospect isn't anything special. Seems to me Chicago wanted to compete and thought the closer might help him make the playoffs. I wouldn't have done that deal because I have a good closer, but it's not outrageous or anything. If Yellow Gloves doesn't make the playoffs and Clay goes -4/-7 in the OS, that's the risk he chose to take. But if Clay puts him over the top and he wins the WS with his help, it was a good bet. I see nothing unethical about it.September 19, 2011 at 06:42PM View BBCode
I chose my wording carefully Lemaster and it was 'reasonable' not 'good'.September 19, 2011 at 07:00PM View BBCode
Firstly, let me just clarify - I wasn't implying anything unethical on the part of the 2 owners concerned and I can see why the trade might make sense, both to Chicago and certainly to New York.September 20, 2011 at 01:24AM View BBCode
I don't want to be implicated in this as a problem maker since I'm new to the league and this seems to be a new issue for the league. I must admit that I may have started the protest in the Pat Wayenberg and KC trade that was just cleared. I made a mistake their as I thought an issue had already been raised because at that time it was still showing "vote on trade" rather than "protest this trade" as it does now. I haven't done any of the other protests though and I would never abuse the system.September 20, 2011 at 02:14AM View BBCode
A lot of people were confused by the initial wording.September 20, 2011 at 02:24AM View BBCode
A witch hunt doesn't serve any purpose here. Let's assume each deal was challenged on its own merits (after all there were 3 votes to overturn the 1 deal) for different reasons by different people. My mantra is 'everyone evaluates talent differently'.September 20, 2011 at 01:49PM View BBCode
If we don't watch out, we will become as dysfunctional as the Big-12.Pages: 1