July 21, 2011 at 01:06AM View BBCode
I am thinking about how many times we want to put somebody as a HOF nominee. I was thinking of putting players up for a total of 3 nominations. Does anyone have any different thoughts on this matter? I would appreciate your opinions.July 21, 2011 at 01:48PM View BBCode
I think that sounds fine. They should have some minimal number of bets in order to get a second and third chance though....July 21, 2011 at 04:37PM View BBCode
I can agree with three, after that if any league owner wants to champion that guy and make a case for that player being inducted he gets one last chance and then it is finale.July 21, 2011 at 10:30PM View BBCode
I like that idea rollman. For instance: Bob Tedrow didn't get in by a 1 to 10 vote would not get a second chance, but Brian Bivin missed by a 7 to 4 vote would get another chance.July 21, 2011 at 11:17PM View BBCode
50% is ok, but... we shouldn't give second chances until the other players worthy of consideration have their first.July 22, 2011 at 03:27AM View BBCode
I agree with the ideas here; 50% sounds good, along with making sure everyone worth considering gets cycled through before we go to the second chance people.Pages: 1