 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Baseball League Forums » Dynasty Leagues » Joe Jackson League » 1981 JJL Minor Leage Ratings
zoom
The idea is to evaluate the minor league systems across the league in terms of how well a system is being maximized for Improvement Chances (ICs) as well as how well stocked each team is with youth.
Here's how the formula works:
Start with 5 for each CP allocated (Max 100)
Deduct 5 for each point under 15 for top the 3 combined
(if the top 3 are 544 it is a 10 point deduct)
Deduct 3 for each minor leaguer over 15
Deduct 1 times CP Assigned times years over
22 if hitter, 23 if pitcher
(a 25 year pitcher with 5 CPs would deduct 10)
AL
DET 97
NYA 95
WAS 97 *
CLE 100
BOS 92
KC 100
BAL 83
OAK 100
NL
BRO 85
PIT 27
NYN 98
STL 61
PHI 100
MIL 95
CIN 90
CHN 100 *
* If you have a * next to your rating, you only have 14 minor leaguers :puzzled: Why waste the ICs? Pick up a scrub from the waiver wire quick!
Zoom
1981 JJL Minor Leage Ratings
February 03, 2010 at 03:58PM View BBCode
All credit for the formula goes to cdunn3, I performed the calculations for our leagueThe idea is to evaluate the minor league systems across the league in terms of how well a system is being maximized for Improvement Chances (ICs) as well as how well stocked each team is with youth.
Here's how the formula works:
Start with 5 for each CP allocated (Max 100)
Deduct 5 for each point under 15 for top the 3 combined
(if the top 3 are 544 it is a 10 point deduct)
Deduct 3 for each minor leaguer over 15
Deduct 1 times CP Assigned times years over
22 if hitter, 23 if pitcher
(a 25 year pitcher with 5 CPs would deduct 10)
AL
DET 97
NYA 95
WAS 97 *
CLE 100
BOS 92
KC 100
BAL 83
OAK 100
NL
BRO 85
PIT 27
NYN 98
STL 61
PHI 100
MIL 95
CIN 90
CHN 100 *
* If you have a * next to your rating, you only have 14 minor leaguers :puzzled: Why waste the ICs? Pick up a scrub from the waiver wire quick!
Zoom
Fulla
Pitt & STL; I have youth and picks to trade. Looking for quality veteran hitters of any age.
[Edited on 2-3-2010 by Fulla]
February 03, 2010 at 04:59PM View BBCode
Pitt will soon face mass retirements and their minors have a 27 score. Ouch!Pitt & STL; I have youth and picks to trade. Looking for quality veteran hitters of any age.
[Edited on 2-3-2010 by Fulla]
DwightKSchrute
February 03, 2010 at 05:07PM View BBCode
So this ignores the quality of the minor league prospects correct?
zoom
Pittsburgh's score is low because they have older minor leaguers that can't move up because the roster is so loaded. That rule that says at least 4 points have to be spent on pitchers cost him 36 points since he had no young pitchers to put the 4 CPs on.
Zoom
February 03, 2010 at 09:37PM View BBCode
yes. It only considers age, number of players, and coach point distribution. Talent is not considered. The higher scores should be associated with the highest number of ICs.Pittsburgh's score is low because they have older minor leaguers that can't move up because the roster is so loaded. That rule that says at least 4 points have to be spent on pitchers cost him 36 points since he had no young pitchers to put the 4 CPs on.
Zoom
zoom
Pittsburgh's score is low because they have older minor leaguers that can't move up because the roster is so loaded. That rule that says at least 4 points have to be spent on pitchers cost him 36 points since he had no young pitchers to put the 4 CPs on.
Zoom
February 03, 2010 at 09:38PM View BBCode
yes. It only considers age, number of players, and coach point distribution. Talent is not considered. The higher scores should be associated with the highest number of ICs.Pittsburgh's score is low because they have older minor leaguers that can't move up because the roster is so loaded. That rule that says at least 4 points have to be spent on pitchers cost him 36 points since he had no young pitchers to put the 4 CPs on.
Zoom
Pages: 1