Poll: How did you like your 1952 Am. Draft Results? | |
---|---|
Way above expectations | 2 |
Above expectations | 2 |
Met expectations | 9 |
Below expectations | 1 |
Way below expectations | 0 |
January 19, 2004 at 04:16PM View BBCode
How did everyone like your results in the '52 Amateur draft?January 19, 2004 at 04:21PM View BBCode
The draft went alright. I filled some of the holes at P and 2B that I wanted to but only my first 3 picks were decent. No one phenomenal either, but over all a pretty good day.January 19, 2004 at 04:30PM View BBCode
Better than the last one. I drafted a pretty good looking starting pitcher and another one with potential. Also a position player that could develope into a good ballplayer.January 19, 2004 at 05:00PM View BBCode
This is my 1st year playing but it looks like I did ok after comparing my picks to the other teams. I am disappointed with 2 of my picks but it is my own fault.January 20, 2004 at 07:05AM View BBCode
I thought this was a very good draft. I had the 7th pick each round and still managed to get a player in each of the first three rounds that I believe will be solid starters on my team. I'm even more amazed by this because 12 pitchers went in the first round, and several more afterwards. Since all of my draft picks ended up being pitchers, and with all the pitchers that went, I'm surprised that a good one was there in the middle 3rd round.January 20, 2004 at 02:35PM View BBCode
Not bad. I got a young SP and some decent young OF prospects so it was o.kJanuary 20, 2004 at 06:31PM View BBCode
I liked it. My first two picks are definate prospects with my third rounder mught turn into a decent starteer. All three are 19 and younger so I won't see how good they are until a couple of years from now.January 21, 2004 at 07:59AM View BBCode
A 24yo pitcher as he #1 overall pick is pretty lousy in my opinion. If he was 20 or 21yo then it be a good pick but not at 24. Same thing with my 2nd round catcher, too old.:(Pages: 1