 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Off Topic » what's next?
shep1582
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/man_sues_bible_publishers/2008/07/10/111626.html?s=al&promo_code=65BF-1
what's next?
July 10, 2008 at 10:00PM View BBCode
murderers, rapists and drunks?http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/man_sues_bible_publishers/2008/07/10/111626.html?s=al&promo_code=65BF-1
FuriousGiorge
July 10, 2008 at 10:31PM View BBCode
See Happy? Not everything you say is completely retarded.
FuriousGiorge
July 10, 2008 at 10:33PM View BBCode
We are somewhat short on unabashed wingnuttery, especially now that 13 only lurks and doesn't post anymore.
happy
Shep, the point is that you stated "whats next?" when there is no particular reason to assume that there is a next.
July 13, 2008 at 07:10PM View BBCode
what the censored ? It showed both of my posts in here as double posts. So i deleted one of the two double posts, and now both of them are gone.Shep, the point is that you stated "whats next?" when there is no particular reason to assume that there is a next.
FuriousGiorge
July 13, 2008 at 08:37PM View BBCode
Next, the Gaystapo drags you from your bed in the middle of the night and ships you off, drugged and blindfolded, to one of their secret Re-Edugaytion Camps.
shep1582
a little paranoid there, george?
can't remember that ever happening in america. sounds like it might work, however.
I think we used to shoot sodomites, though. A messy business as I understand it.
July 13, 2008 at 11:24PM View BBCode
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
Next, the Gaystapo drags you from your bed in the middle of the night and ships you off, drugged and blindfolded, to one of their secret Re-Edugaytion Camps.
a little paranoid there, george?
can't remember that ever happening in america. sounds like it might work, however.
I think we used to shoot sodomites, though. A messy business as I understand it.
FuriousGiorge
July 13, 2008 at 11:55PM View BBCode
If it's not man-on-woman, missionary-style sex, off with their heads.
FuriousGiorge
July 14, 2008 at 02:12AM View BBCode
I just hate the gays. I thought we were on the same page.
happy
July 14, 2008 at 06:01AM View BBCode
The inherent flaw in the "slippery slope" argument is that you are looking at the wrong SLOPE. Maybe the slope is for GAY people, not for the bible being changed. Doesnt that kind of make sense? havent you noticed that there is a trend for *gay* people? Like, gay marriage doesnt lead to horse marriage. gay marriage might lead to more pro gay stuff, like this for example.
shep1582
like enron. first the employees sue for their money, then vendors, then creditors, etc. see the slope?
I'm sorry you hate, george. I hate no one. I was just poking the bear...
July 14, 2008 at 02:08PM View BBCode
however, it CAN lead to others suing for the same type emotional damages.like enron. first the employees sue for their money, then vendors, then creditors, etc. see the slope?
I'm sorry you hate, george. I hate no one. I was just poking the bear...
happy
as i already said. the case is stupid (and will unquestionably be thrown out in court anyway), but the slippery slope argument is stupider. I have no way of proving this to you, but if you have half a brain you know in your heart the argument is dumb anyway, so ill leave you to ponder it yourself.
July 14, 2008 at 03:02PM View BBCode
ugh. Sure. you're so right.as i already said. the case is stupid (and will unquestionably be thrown out in court anyway), but the slippery slope argument is stupider. I have no way of proving this to you, but if you have half a brain you know in your heart the argument is dumb anyway, so ill leave you to ponder it yourself.
shep1582
and as i said, i was merely poking the bear.
but slopes, especially slippery ones, can be descended by a variety of slopers.
i.e. when women got the right to vote, next they got the right to own property.
or...
when women got the right to vote, then negro slaves did.
see the slopes? different, yet sloping all the same.
you are wrong, but i appreciate you insulting me.
:rolleyes:
July 14, 2008 at 03:32PM View BBCode
well I do have half a brain. actually 52.37% of a brain.and as i said, i was merely poking the bear.
but slopes, especially slippery ones, can be descended by a variety of slopers.
i.e. when women got the right to vote, next they got the right to own property.
or...
when women got the right to vote, then negro slaves did.
see the slopes? different, yet sloping all the same.
you are wrong, but i appreciate you insulting me.
:rolleyes:
shep1582
which it logically could, but probably never will.
a slope is not limited to one faction, nor are the factions limited to one course once on the slope.
i'm glad you are so riled up, however.
July 14, 2008 at 03:37PM View BBCode
the slippery slopes people also said gay marriage legalization would lead to polygamist legalization.which it logically could, but probably never will.
a slope is not limited to one faction, nor are the factions limited to one course once on the slope.
i'm glad you are so riled up, however.
happy
July 14, 2008 at 05:13PM View BBCode
im convinced now. Murderers are going to bring a court case against the bible next. Thats a completely legitimate point of view and the clear logical next step. I concede the point.
shep1582
not all liars are inveterate liars, but they are liars.
i have successfully poked the bear.
I'll be here all year...
July 14, 2008 at 06:08PM View BBCode
well, since all homos are sinners but not all sinners are homos, it was necessary to lump sinners together, regardless of the sin, for the purpose of having slope riders. I could have said extortionists, liars and vandals. I could have said priests, false prophets and devils. Sin was the interwoven thread. get it?not all liars are inveterate liars, but they are liars.
i have successfully poked the bear.
I'll be here all year...
Benne
July 14, 2008 at 07:59PM View BBCode
censored gay people. Always keeping the straight man down.Pages: 1 2