 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Off Topic » New Worst Person in the World = Dean Hancock
TheMightyJobu
He needs to add another pair of defendants: Josh's parents, for doing such a pathetic job of raising him.
New Worst Person in the World = Dean Hancock
May 25, 2007 at 06:01PM View BBCode
http://myespn.go.com/conversation/story?id=2881602&status=okHe needs to add another pair of defendants: Josh's parents, for doing such a pathetic job of raising him.
FuriousGiorge
May 25, 2007 at 06:27PM View BBCode
Unbelievable. All you're doing is keeping in the news what a negligent asshole your son was, so good work.
barterer2002
May 25, 2007 at 09:34PM View BBCode
Its always good to include the guy who's car stalled in a lawsuit from the guy who smashed into it.
Faceman
May 31, 2007 at 04:10PM View BBCode
This is hopefully just an exercise he must go through as executor of his son's estate, distasteful as it is.
FuriousGiorge
May 31, 2007 at 04:41PM View BBCode
Suing the bar that sold him the drinks is one thing. But adding the tow truck driver and the driver of the car that Hancock's irresponsible son slammed into? That's just a guy looking to point the finger at someone else.
Faceman
here's the theory. I really can't imagine this guy thinks he's going to win a lawsuit against the other stranded motorist. Or he's really stupid. All this does is bring it up again and make them look like fools. Hopefully, he realizes that and still feels like he must protect the estate.
http://www.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=4613252&highlight=#4613252
May 31, 2007 at 04:47PM View BBCode
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
Suing the bar that sold him the drinks is one thing. But adding the tow truck driver and the driver of the car that Hancock's irresponsible son slammed into? That's just a guy looking to point the finger at someone else.
here's the theory. I really can't imagine this guy thinks he's going to win a lawsuit against the other stranded motorist. Or he's really stupid. All this does is bring it up again and make them look like fools. Hopefully, he realizes that and still feels like he must protect the estate.
http://www.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=4613252&highlight=#4613252
FuriousGiorge
May 31, 2007 at 04:52PM View BBCode
If that's the case, then he really owes it to the memory of his son to say so. Sit down with a reporter, someone trustworthy, and lay it out. People would understand.
Faceman
Agreed - and maybe that's the plan at some point. Maybe it would be a problem if he declared that his intent before the action? "I'm really just doing this as a formality, please throw it out." Just guessing here.
May 31, 2007 at 05:31PM View BBCode
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
If that's the case, then he really owes it to the memory of his son to say so. Sit down with a reporter, someone trustworthy, and lay it out. People would understand.
Agreed - and maybe that's the plan at some point. Maybe it would be a problem if he declared that his intent before the action? "I'm really just doing this as a formality, please throw it out." Just guessing here.
Pages: 1