 |
View Old Forum Thread
moeheep4
Bart McCool hits .330, .589 slug &, 36 HR and 122 RBI, yet he finished 2nd to a Pug Bero, who hit .312,.545 slug &, 35 HR and 97 RBI. I am not trying to take anything away from Bero, but McCool was higher in all catagories and I was just wondering what the MVP is based on.
Also All Star team starters
Nolan Fry 21-4 2.59 ERA 1.21 WHIP CY YOUNG WINNER AllStar #3
Chavez 17-10 2.52 ERA, 1.10 WHIP AllStar Starter
Slayback 17-9 2.85 ERA, 1.15 WHIPAllStar #2
both Fry and Slayback have better stats than Chavez, again, not taking anything away from anybody, (I would love all 5 of these guys on my team) I just don't see how the AllStar starter is calculated.
Does anyone know??
[Edited on 5-10-2007 by moeheep4]
[Edited on 5-10-2007 by moeheep4]
????????
May 10, 2007 at 12:56AM View BBCode
Does anyone know the MVP formula.Bart McCool hits .330, .589 slug &, 36 HR and 122 RBI, yet he finished 2nd to a Pug Bero, who hit .312,.545 slug &, 35 HR and 97 RBI. I am not trying to take anything away from Bero, but McCool was higher in all catagories and I was just wondering what the MVP is based on.
Also All Star team starters
Nolan Fry 21-4 2.59 ERA 1.21 WHIP CY YOUNG WINNER AllStar #3
Chavez 17-10 2.52 ERA, 1.10 WHIP AllStar Starter
Slayback 17-9 2.85 ERA, 1.15 WHIPAllStar #2
both Fry and Slayback have better stats than Chavez, again, not taking anything away from anybody, (I would love all 5 of these guys on my team) I just don't see how the AllStar starter is calculated.
Does anyone know??
[Edited on 5-10-2007 by moeheep4]
[Edited on 5-10-2007 by moeheep4]
npstamps
May 10, 2007 at 01:29AM View BBCode
I'm not sure about any of the formulas for All-Star, Cy Young, etc. It always seemed unusual to me. Maybe somewhere on the "Questions and Answers" message board, you may find it, or if not, post it and someone would probably know it. Anyway, your numbers on the pitchers are incorrect. Chavez' ERA for this year was 2.52, and his WHIP was 1.10. Slayback's ERA 2.85, and WHIP was 1.15. The numbers you were looking at were career totals, not this year's.
moeheep4
[Edited on 5-10-2007 by moeheep4]
May 10, 2007 at 10:46AM View BBCode
That what happens when you are in a hurry! Now I can almost see why the allstar rankings are the way they are (although in my opinion 4 more wins and 6 less losses go further than a slight edge in ERA and WHIP) but I'm still not sold on the MVP rankings. Anyway is is no big deal, I as just wondering, I'm sure we have all looked at the final allstar page and scratched our heads at some of the selections.[Edited on 5-10-2007 by moeheep4]
RamBeast2
May 10, 2007 at 07:54PM View BBCode
As strange as it would seem, AB's actually play into it - Not sure if it really should, as McCool was clearly more productive, but at this point it does.
judgetrainer
May 11, 2007 at 12:52PM View BBCode
I've seen the Cy Young not be the All Star #1 more than once. I think it has to do with wins in that particular quirk. Fireman is not always the top RP either.Pages: 1