July 02, 2006 at 11:48PM View BBCode
AL Starters:July 03, 2006 at 12:55AM View BBCode
I was just quickly looking at the stats and you can't argue with a lot of the reserves in the AL. (Not like that year with Ventura and the yankees) But still the tigers got hosed they are leading the world in wins they should have more players than I-rod in the All star game but the game is a joke anyway. What no bonds...July 03, 2006 at 02:34AM View BBCode
I might be biased but I would take Adam Dunn and Brandon Phillips as backups over Edgar Renteria and Andruw Jones.July 03, 2006 at 07:51PM View BBCode
I know Mark Redman is only in the game because of the stupid rule about every team having a player, but what a joke. That rule cheapens the game.July 03, 2006 at 08:04PM View BBCode
I don't really mind Gary Matthews being in it, he's having a much better year than Michael Young, who is inept defensively and is currently 43rd in OPS with a .798 OPS. Again, Vlad really shouldn't be there but he got voted in. Its rediculous that only one of Hafner, Liriano, and Verlander will make it. Both Liriano and Verlander have had significantly better seasons than Buerhle.July 04, 2006 at 03:52AM View BBCode
The AL team is a disaster, and the only problem in the NL (other than all the non-Nationals players in the starting lineup) is that Bobby Abreu is leading the National League in OBP (fuck you Phillies fans, he's a very good player that oyu don't appreciate).July 04, 2006 at 04:02AM View BBCode
Originally posted by turkob
I know Mark Redman is only in the game because of the stupid rule about every team having a player, but what a joke. That rule cheapens the game.
July 04, 2006 at 04:10AM View BBCode
Originally posted by Cubsfan13
I don't really mind Gary Matthews being in it, he's having a much better year than Michael Young, who is inept defensively
July 04, 2006 at 04:17AM View BBCode
7 errors, but the man has very little range. I like Young because I watch a good amount Rangers games and he is a good player, but he's better off at second base. Inept may have been a bit strong, but he's certainly in the lower half of defensive shortstops in the majors.July 04, 2006 at 06:29AM View BBCode
This year is another perfect example of one of the biggest problems with baseball (outside of drug testing etc...).July 04, 2006 at 06:38AM View BBCode
Originally posted by rkinslow19Do you really want a guy from the Royals determing the winner of the world series?
July 04, 2006 at 08:41AM View BBCode
Originally posted by youngallstar
Alot of people had written off Gary Mathews Jr as a never will be cough*whiskybear*cough. I watched him play all year last year and you could see he had it in him to be a solid ballplayer
July 04, 2006 at 06:23PM View BBCode
Originally posted by barterer2002
I couldn't disagree more. First off, the rosters of the all-star team are expanded to 32 to accomodate all the players from teams that need a representative. Second off, the best thing for a kid watching the game is to see players from his team that he roots for everyday. Its the one thing that makes the MLB all star game better than any other pro sport. Would I change some things about the game and the selection process. Of course I would. Is the rule requiring a representative from every team one of those things-absolutely not.
July 04, 2006 at 07:26PM View BBCode
I don't understand why you think it hurts to have local players in the game for each team. Kids root for players from their team and it has nothing to do with whether they idolize that player or not. When my son watches a game (he's 6) he has no idea who any of the players are but he knows that he roots for the Phillies and so he asks me which ones are the Phillies.July 05, 2006 at 02:13AM View BBCode
Originally posted by barterer2002
If you believe that it is a reward for the best players then you're absolutely correct, Mark Redman shouldn't be on the team but he clearly isn't the only one and the voting system should be changed as well.
On the other hand, if you believe that the game is for the fans as a fun exhibition then of course every fan should have a player from "his" team to root for (or her team). I come down more on the second side and I suspect that you're more on the first side.
July 05, 2006 at 02:15AM View BBCode
Originally posted by whiskybear
Originally posted by youngallstar
Alot of people had written off Gary Mathews Jr as a never will be cough*whiskybear*cough. I watched him play all year last year and you could see he had it in him to be a solid ballplayer
You're talking about a journeyman 31-year-old outfielder (32 in August) with exactly one season (this one) with an average above .276, exactly one other season besides this one with an OPS over .800, and a career OBP of .332.
Scott Brosius had a career year once, too. The difference? The Rangers aren't going to win the World Series.
July 05, 2006 at 02:55AM View BBCode
Originally posted by rkinslow19
Root for the best player of your local crappy team during the other 162 games of the year. The all-star game should showcase talent - the best of the best. After all, it is an all-star game. Leave equal representation to little league.
July 05, 2006 at 03:09AM View BBCode
Originally posted by barterer2002
Originally posted by rkinslow19
Root for the best player of your local crappy team during the other 162 games of the year. The all-star game should showcase talent - the best of the best. After all, it is an all-star game. Leave equal representation to little league.
Hard to believe you'd come down on the wrong side again Kinslow
July 05, 2006 at 02:12PM View BBCode
The All-Star game does not showcase talent when 3 of the 4 infielders all are Yankees for the American league... That is a showcase of overrated big market teams... All-Star game is supposed to be fun, but when you are talking about who should be included think of this... Every team has at least All-Star calibre player... This I feel strongly about. Is Mark Redman KC's? Probably not, but that crappy team does have one. Think of the Pirates... They are one of the worse things to play the game day in and day out, but I think Bay is more than deserving of his spot on the team... Not to mention a few other players from that squad. Keep in mind this is coming from a Twins fan who in my opinion got ubber screwed when it comes to the All-Star team. There is no reason Liriano should be the "Final Vote" and that Justin Morneau was excluded completely...July 05, 2006 at 03:58PM View BBCode
Originally posted by ShaggySanchez
I might be biased but I would take Adam Dunn and Brandon Phillips as backups over Edgar Renteria and Andruw Jones.
July 09, 2006 at 12:02AM View BBCode
You know, every year there are players that are "deserving" that aren't all stars. Sometimes it is a situation of teams like Redman, other times its a matter of position. Remember the big deal a few years ago when the AL had four all-star shortstops. How often can you do that and also, remember that Tejada wasn't one of the four (Nomar, Derek, Alex and Omar). In short, its imperfect but it will always be imperfect. It was no better when the Reds stuffed the ballot box back in '57 or so.July 11, 2006 at 07:11AM View BBCode
Originally posted by barterer2002
Originally posted by rkinslow19
Root for the best player of your local crappy team during the other 162 games of the year. The all-star game should showcase talent - the best of the best. After all, it is an all-star game. Leave equal representation to little league.
Hard to believe you'd come down on the wrong side again Kinslow
July 11, 2006 at 12:01PM View BBCode
But is there truely profit to be contented with? Are you content with it even when there is none?Pages: 1 2