 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Sports Talk » Most Likely to Happen to the Yankees
| Poll: Most Likely to Happen to the Yankees | |
|---|---|
| Giambi hits under .270 with less than 35HR | 6 |
| Randy Johnson has less than 20 starts | 0 |
| AROD actually starts carrying a purse to games | 1 |
| Pavano adds 1.50 to his ERA, pitching in the AL | 0 |
| Jeter KOed when Brown mistakes him for a wall | 0 |
| Age catches up with, well, everyone | 1 |
| Win The World Series | 1 |
| Lose the ALCS, payroll goes to $300mil in '06 | 5 |
Funkmonger
Most Likely to Happen to the Yankees
February 01, 2005 at 12:17AM View formatted
You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
Which of these things is most likely to happen to the 2005 Yankees?
hobos
February 01, 2005 at 12:18AM View BBCode
Age catches up to them. Brown KOing Jeter is also very likely, but I'm only allowed to vote once
ABDREW
#3 is already true
#4 there is a chance but it won't go up that much
#5 I say its Brown and Johnson
#7 and #8 are 50/50
February 01, 2005 at 12:46AM View BBCode
#1 is pretty much a given,#3 is already true
#4 there is a chance but it won't go up that much
#5 I say its Brown and Johnson
#7 and #8 are 50/50
jetpac
February 01, 2005 at 02:47AM View BBCode
Giambi might hit under .240 with less than 15 HRs! (Please be wrong)
Funkmonger
Come now, we all learned in '04 to keep the faith ;)
February 01, 2005 at 05:35AM View BBCode
Originally posted by Smocko
They beat the Red Sox, of course.
Come now, we all learned in '04 to keep the faith ;)
ME
February 01, 2005 at 05:48AM View BBCode
Yankees making Youppi! their mascot, and go on 69 game winning streak is more likely than Giambi hitting 35 HR.
1tim412
We shall see....
February 01, 2005 at 06:11AM View BBCode
Originally posted by ME
Yankees making Youppi! their mascot, and go on 69 game winning streak is more likely than Giambi hitting 35 HR.
We shall see....
Funkmonger
Routing for the Yankees is like routing for the house to win in blackjack... Where's the fun?
February 01, 2005 at 06:22AM View BBCode
Originally posted by Smocko
I have faith too.
Routing for the Yankees is like routing for the house to win in blackjack... Where's the fun?
1tim412
February 01, 2005 at 06:25AM View BBCode
Yeah, the fun is rooting against them and watching them lose when they do so much to win as a group of All-Stars, not a team. It's kinda like... the Simpsons, the ultimate dysfunctional family except the only talented one in the family is Lisa... Just like Jeter is the glue in the team that gets the best out of his teammates. That's why they have had infinitely better players on their teams in the last 4 years than they did in the late 90s and they haven't won a single WS! Yeah!
FuriousGiorge
Seriously, would everyone stop stealing lines from Bill Simmons without giving the man credit.
February 01, 2005 at 06:37AM View BBCode
Originally posted by Funkmonger
Routing for the Yankees is like routing for the house to win in blackjack... Where's the fun?
Seriously, would everyone stop stealing lines from Bill Simmons without giving the man credit.
whiskybear
Too true.
February 01, 2005 at 08:38AM View BBCode
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
Seriously, would everyone stop stealing lines from Bill Simmons without giving the man credit.
Too true.
ABDREW
its cute how you Yankee fans cling to the past like a favorite blanky
February 01, 2005 at 11:06AM View BBCode
Originally posted by Smocko
They beat the Red Sox, of course.
its cute how you Yankee fans cling to the past like a favorite blanky
Funkmonger
Would have given him a nod if I'd realized I was quoting him, sorry about that - I knew I'd heard it somewhere along the way... :rolleyes:
February 01, 2005 at 02:50PM View BBCode
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
Originally posted by Funkmonger
Routing for the Yankees is like routing for the house to win in blackjack... Where's the fun?
Seriously, would everyone stop stealing lines from Bill Simmons without giving the man credit.
Would have given him a nod if I'd realized I was quoting him, sorry about that - I knew I'd heard it somewhere along the way... :rolleyes:
FuriousGiorge
"If a person has already been called-out/made fun of for a post, it is against the rules to call-out/make fun of him for a different issue in the same post. This is called "piling-on" and is totally uncool, jerkwad."
February 01, 2005 at 04:01PM View BBCode
Rule #359 in "Message Board Rules and Regulations":"If a person has already been called-out/made fun of for a post, it is against the rules to call-out/make fun of him for a different issue in the same post. This is called "piling-on" and is totally uncool, jerkwad."
skierdude44
Hmm... The Yankees have been beating the Red Sox for 86 out of the last 87 years. I would have to say that the odds are still heavily in their favor. And last year could have just been an abberation, but its pretty hard to argue that the past 86 years have all been abberations.
February 01, 2005 at 08:06PM View BBCode
Originally posted by ABDREW
Originally posted by Smocko
They beat the Red Sox, of course.
its cute how you Yankee fans cling to the past like a favorite blanky
Hmm... The Yankees have been beating the Red Sox for 86 out of the last 87 years. I would have to say that the odds are still heavily in their favor. And last year could have just been an abberation, but its pretty hard to argue that the past 86 years have all been abberations.
whiskybear
Skierdude, look what I found:
Quit crying.
February 01, 2005 at 08:35PM View BBCode
Originally posted by skierdude44
Hmm... The Yankees have been beating the Red Sox for 86 out of the last 87 years. I would have to say that the odds are still heavily in their favor. And last year could have just been an abberation, but its pretty hard to argue that the past 86 years have all been abberations.
Skierdude, look what I found:
Quit crying.
ABDREW
Do Met fans say " We are going to win it all this year just because we did it in '86"? Do the Celtics fans think they will win it all because they've won more than anyone else? Nooooooooooo.
February 01, 2005 at 10:44PM View BBCode
abberation? where do you see that in my post? I said clinging to the past.Do Met fans say " We are going to win it all this year just because we did it in '86"? Do the Celtics fans think they will win it all because they've won more than anyone else? Nooooooooooo.
JLlamas
February 01, 2005 at 11:35PM View BBCode
good point Abdrew, this doesnt really go with the discussion but Im gonna say that #1 is thae most likely to happen although I think his numbers will be around, .275, 15HR, 60 RBI. even with out steriods this guy can play, but they have a negative affect on your body after you quit (from what I understand) so he should she a drop this year, if he is clean. but I think he will end up posting numbers simaler to his brother
Newcomer
The great thing is- we've won one now, and it feels great. There's little to nothing Yankees fans can say to bother us, though I know they'll try.
I will still admit that the Yankees will continue to be a successful team, and by ALDS time in 2005 they'll be close to or at the top, per usual. Giambi, however, will not be the dynamo he once was. I look forward to watching Randy Johnson though. He'll be a terror in pinstripes, and fun to watch.
world series...
February 02, 2005 at 07:50PM View BBCode
As a Red Sox fan, I admit it's frustrating that though Yankees fans can no longer chant "1918" and actually bother us, they can and will still brag about their team's 26 world series rings.The great thing is- we've won one now, and it feels great. There's little to nothing Yankees fans can say to bother us, though I know they'll try.
I will still admit that the Yankees will continue to be a successful team, and by ALDS time in 2005 they'll be close to or at the top, per usual. Giambi, however, will not be the dynamo he once was. I look forward to watching Randy Johnson though. He'll be a terror in pinstripes, and fun to watch.
Funkmonger
I'm surprised that no one's picked Randy Johnson to have less than 20 starts as of yet. Maybe under 20 is too many missed games, but I'd think having no cartilage in one knee and the fact that he's older than dirt would make him a likely DL candidate...
February 02, 2005 at 10:43PM View BBCode
Originally posted by Newcomer
I look forward to watching Randy Johnson though. He'll be a terror in pinstripes, and fun to watch.
I'm surprised that no one's picked Randy Johnson to have less than 20 starts as of yet. Maybe under 20 is too many missed games, but I'd think having no cartilage in one knee and the fact that he's older than dirt would make him a likely DL candidate...
skierdude44
February 02, 2005 at 11:53PM View BBCode
He has pitched 220+ innings in 3 of the last 4 seasons and throughout his career has been a very very durable pitcher. Sure there is a chance that he will miss time but looking over his history that seems unlikely.Pages: 1 2