July 01, 2015 at 06:16PM View BBCode
So the last couple of seasons I spent some time putting Pittsburgh's roster back in order, and this year they come back and bite my ass by beating out LA for the wild card spot in the NL by one game.July 07, 2015 at 12:49PM View BBCode
It looks like you turned the tables in the [url=http://beta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?player=nobody&mode=stats&id=9826492]Hannifin[/url] deal. I don't think a "real" owner would have given you [url=http://beta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?id=9825881]Rudolph[/url] for it...July 07, 2015 at 03:44PM View BBCode
Really ?July 08, 2015 at 10:25AM View BBCode
No...and you should know me better than that. It was based on dealing a turd (B/B+ vs RHP and B+ SPD) for a thing that is useful (B/A+ vs RHP with A- SPD). I still assert that a rational owner would not make that deal...July 08, 2015 at 10:55AM View BBCode
And why did San Francisco just give players to Boston?July 08, 2015 at 04:08PM View BBCode
Hey rogue apparently the 24 team beta is looking for new owners who care about winning and shit like that, even though they aren't actually testing anything either, maybe you should join them .July 08, 2015 at 05:41PM View BBCode
It just feels odd when people make trades between two teams they own, that other owners would not make.July 09, 2015 at 07:32PM View BBCode
I been passing players back and forth forever. My goal has always been to have them both 'viable.' So extra guys go to the other team or visa versa...July 09, 2015 at 08:47PM View formatted
July 16, 2015 at 12:44AM View BBCode
So with a month to go the Hanifan/Rudolph trade isn't looking that one sided anymore now is it ??August 14, 2015 at 04:50AM View BBCode
So it's over two years since the infamous, in thatrogue's mind, [url=http://beta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?player=nobody&mode=stats&id=9826492]Hannifan[/url]/[url=http://beta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?id=9825881]Rudolph[/url] trade. It's a deal that it was claimed no "real" owner would have made, which leads me to wonder if "real" owners know what they are doing.August 17, 2015 at 04:07AM View BBCode
Based on the ratings it was a horrible trade. The numbers are skewed because of the lack of quality pitching in the league.August 18, 2015 at 03:35AM View BBCode
I stay with it because it represents a fundamental flaw in the majority of sim owners trading patterns. You stick with the "based on the ratings" mantra, as many owners do, without seeming to take into account the fact that top end OFers are plentiful while better than average catchers are rare. Hanifan's replacement value, even though his ratings are lower, was equal or higher than Rudolph yet you, and many sim owners, would reject that sort of deal out of hand based on trying to compare apples to oranges.August 19, 2015 at 01:24PM View BBCode
All of the ratings are important, so I believe health/games played must also be considered. Rudolph had been averaging 35 - 40 more games played than Hannifan, at the time of the trade. So you have to look at the lineup impact of the difference in 2nd catcher production to Hannifan's production...as compared to a lesser OF's production vs a lesser catcher's production for those 35-40 games...and that is a significant issue. I don't know why Hannifan's games played dropped so significantly in 2066, but that could not be predicted at the time of the trade.Pages: 1