 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Baseball Beta Testing » Beta News » New way to track standings
tysonlowery
Going forward, you'll be able to check out previous year's standings. There may be problems with previous season's standings when an expansion team is involved. I'm going to look into that one next.
New way to track standings
June 07, 2004 at 09:46PM View BBCode
I ripped apart the back end and changed how standings are tracked. Let me know if you see any bugs.Going forward, you'll be able to check out previous year's standings. There may be problems with previous season's standings when an expansion team is involved. I'm going to look into that one next.
tysonlowery
June 07, 2004 at 09:47PM View BBCode
FYI - I want to get this in because it may play a part into some of the anti-tanking stuff in the future.
tysonlowery
June 07, 2004 at 10:11PM View BBCode
I just made a significant number of back-end changes to account for this. Let me know if you see any problems on any of the pages. I created 2 dummy defunct teams to help with the testing, in both leagues, both baltimore.
tysonlowery
June 07, 2004 at 10:17PM View BBCode
I'd like to run an Expansion draft to test the latest changes. Any volunteers in the Short Term league?
BleedRed
[Edited on 6-7-2004 by BleedRed]
June 07, 2004 at 10:18PM View formatted
You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
No objections from NYN. What do you need?[Edited on 6-7-2004 by BleedRed]
jer2911
June 07, 2004 at 10:52PM View BBCode
Is there any way to get the standings for previous seasons?
tysonlowery
BleedRed - create a 2nd screen name on the Beta site and let me know what the name is. I'll run an Expansion draft with you, betauser, and the owner who is inactive.
June 07, 2004 at 11:05PM View BBCode
They are being tracked going forward.BleedRed - create a 2nd screen name on the Beta site and let me know what the name is. I'll run an Expansion draft with you, betauser, and the owner who is inactive.
poppabeta
Poppabeta
June 08, 2004 at 12:42PM View BBCode
Tyson, I have created another account on the Beta site if you need another participant for the expansion draft. Screen Name: Poppabeta2Poppabeta
disciple
Obviously this is a little confusing, so we should probably stick with one standard: NL on the right and AL on the left - same as the League Scores and All-stars pages.
possible issue
June 08, 2004 at 03:01PM View BBCode
When I go to the standings page initially the NL standings are on the left and the AL on the right. If I press the submit button, the standings are reversed so that the AL is on the left and he NL on the right.Obviously this is a little confusing, so we should probably stick with one standard: NL on the right and AL on the left - same as the League Scores and All-stars pages.
tysonlowery
June 08, 2004 at 03:22PM View BBCode
I'll have to keep an eye on this one. I suspect once there are actual results for the previous seasons, it will display correctly. We'll have to see.
Jack1
I' ll take a Beta Expansion Team. ID JackBeta1.
Jack1
June 08, 2004 at 04:17PM View BBCode
Hi T-Low,I' ll take a Beta Expansion Team. ID JackBeta1.
Jack1
tysonlowery
June 08, 2004 at 09:29PM View BBCode
Zipping through the playoffs and OffSeason for ST League. Thanks for the volunteers.
ME
Not all of the teams records add up to 162 games. I am 20-139, only 159 games, even though on the schedule page it says I played 162 games. Pittsburgh is 117-44 (161 games), though KC is right with 143-19 (adds up to the correct total of 162). There are a few other teams with records not adding up to 162.
[Edited on 6-8-2004 by ME]
June 08, 2004 at 09:36PM View BBCode
The 1957 long-term standings are messed up. The season is over, but the standing page is wrong.Not all of the teams records add up to 162 games. I am 20-139, only 159 games, even though on the schedule page it says I played 162 games. Pittsburgh is 117-44 (161 games), though KC is right with 143-19 (adds up to the correct total of 162). There are a few other teams with records not adding up to 162.
[Edited on 6-8-2004 by ME]
tysonlowery
I was able to test what I needed to test with the Expansion process and make some adjustments. Let me know if anything else doesn't add up.
June 08, 2004 at 10:21PM View BBCode
I think this is because of the problems we had with the games played way back when, remember?I was able to test what I needed to test with the Expansion process and make some adjustments. Let me know if anything else doesn't add up.
geoffrey13
June 12, 2004 at 12:46AM View BBCode
the new seasons standings are messed up as well...my team (Porkers) have played 12 games but my record only shows 10
tysonlowery
June 12, 2004 at 08:50PM View BBCode
See the other post about this one geoffrey. Thanks.Pages: 1