October 18, 2011 at 03:23AM View BBCode
OK so we all know chris is too busy to set his draft preferences, I'd be happy to do it for him if he asked, but I am flabbergasted that Calgary chose [url=http://footballbeta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?id=170770]Mulitalo[/url] over [url=http://footballbeta.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?id=171730]Carapella[/url].October 18, 2011 at 03:26AM View BBCode
Yeah, I had Mulitalo ranked over Carapella, but that's only because I drafted my franchise guy last season. There ought to be some sort of positional importance built into the default draft rankings. It obviously needs to go beyond the overall player ratings.October 18, 2011 at 03:56AM View BBCode
You, and Miami, are the only teams who realistically wouldn't have Carapella #1.October 18, 2011 at 03:59AM View formatted
October 18, 2011 at 04:05AM View BBCode
I took Mulitalo with my eyes wide open. If I had to do it over, I would take Mulitalo over Carapella again. In fact, if I hadn't gotten Mulitalo I would have taken Pound.October 18, 2011 at 04:40AM View BBCode
Originally posted by Hamilton2
There ought to be some sort of positional importance built into the default draft rankings. It obviously needs to go beyond the overall player ratings.
October 18, 2011 at 07:03AM View BBCode
I hit the jackpot?!? I haven't even had a chance to check the draft results, but I'm not gonna lie, I'm not sure how much it would matter what the rest of my draft class looks like..considering I had an older, #16 QB, I'm pretty happy..maybe even get to say bye to top-3 draft picks for a while?Pages: 1