 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Sim Forums » Check This Out! » This is why People Tank
tworoosters
There is the prime example of why people tank, the difference between Ratzer and the next best player in the draft is just silly .
This is why People Tank
May 31, 2010 at 04:15PM View BBCode
The BHL draft was just revealed, it's mediocre except for [url=http://www.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?mode=player&playername=nobody&id=7500482]this[/url] .There is the prime example of why people tank, the difference between Ratzer and the next best player in the draft is just silly .
shep1582
May 31, 2010 at 05:13PM View BBCode
that, and there is no backlash from the fans when you do.
bpearly69
May 31, 2010 at 09:22PM View BBCode
you got the first pick in that draft? i remember you were rebuilding that league ?
kyleturf30
Never seen two that good that close together. Usually you get a pitcher like that it's at least 10 years before you see another.
June 01, 2010 at 11:38AM View BBCode
And to think [url=http://www.simdynasty.com/player.jsp?player=nobody&mode=stats&id=7181191]This guy[/url] was the #1 overall pick in that same league 3 seasons ago.Never seen two that good that close together. Usually you get a pitcher like that it's at least 10 years before you see another.
tworoosters
[Edited on 6-1-2010 by tworoosters]
June 01, 2010 at 04:27PM View BBCode
Sadly even with Stirnweiss Philly are still in line for a top 5 pick .[Edited on 6-1-2010 by tworoosters]
redcped
June 01, 2010 at 05:38PM View BBCode
Must be some awful offense if that couldn't do better than 8-17, but then how does one explain 20-2 the next year?
kyleturf30
June 01, 2010 at 06:57PM View BBCode
And that league is wacky anyway. Ratings in there do not seem to equate to ratings in other leagues. The performance for alot of would be 'stars' can be all over the place from year to year.
tworoosters
When your top players get to play 24-48 games a year against teams that win 40-50 games a year the stats go up . The BoHo rarely has more than one 100 loss team per year and hardly ever has a team lose more than 110 games, only 3 times in the past decade.
Check the stats of the guys posting huge numbers in your other leagues and see what their numbers are against teams winning less than 50 games, that's where the big numbers come from.
June 01, 2010 at 08:14PM View BBCode
It's because everybody is trying to win Kyle . That's also why you hardly ever see teams win more than 110 games in the league as well .When your top players get to play 24-48 games a year against teams that win 40-50 games a year the stats go up . The BoHo rarely has more than one 100 loss team per year and hardly ever has a team lose more than 110 games, only 3 times in the past decade.
Check the stats of the guys posting huge numbers in your other leagues and see what their numbers are against teams winning less than 50 games, that's where the big numbers come from.
kyleturf30
June 01, 2010 at 08:34PM View BBCode
Interesting. Never really thought of it that way.. I figured it had to do with our injury system/minor league system coupled with Variable development which is what made everything wacky.
shep1582
We had no one hit 35 HRs, only 2 guys hit over .320, 2 guys won 21 games, no one else over 19, 4 SPs with ERAs under 3.00.
roosters is on to something. We have a no tanking policy, so no teams throw WW trash in to their pitching staffs or lineups, preventing Ruthian stats.
June 02, 2010 at 04:33PM View BBCode
We had one team win 100 in the EDL this past season (exactly 100), and no teams tanking.We had no one hit 35 HRs, only 2 guys hit over .320, 2 guys won 21 games, no one else over 19, 4 SPs with ERAs under 3.00.
roosters is on to something. We have a no tanking policy, so no teams throw WW trash in to their pitching staffs or lineups, preventing Ruthian stats.
happy
June 07, 2010 at 09:24PM View formatted
You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
o
Pages: 1