 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Baseball League Forums » Dynasty Leagues » Joe Jackson League » JJL Team Profiles 6/1/1981
zoom
I applied the rules to our league.
------------------------------------------------------------
This index has some correlation to how a team
will perform in a season, but it is not
conclusive. Injuries,trades,roster changes,
ABE's whims,and manager preferences will all factor in.
Also Only overall ratings are considered.
Players on ML rosters are considered.
If all 25 were A+ overall, the rating
would be 100. If all B+ it would be
70, all B 60, etc. For pitchers, relievers
are weighted at 1/3 of starters. For
hitters, bench players are weighted at
1/3 of starters vs. RHP.
Age Index - considering SP, Closer, and Regulars vs RHP
22 is very young, 34 is very old
(Note all reported values below are rounded to the nearest whole number)
AL (Current Standings) TOTAL / PITCHING / HITTING (Age Index)
Det (1st -0) 76 / 81 / 74 (aging)
Was(3rd -16) 73 / 76 / 72 (aging pitching)
NYA (2nd -14) 73 / 76 / 71 (aging)
CLE (4th -16) 72 / 74 / 72 (aging)
KC (6th -21) 71 / 70 / 72 (young)
BOS (5th -19) 70 / 67 / 72
BAL (7th -24) 68 / 67 / 69 (aging)
OAK (8th -34) 63 / 66 / 62 (very young pitching)
NL (Current Standings -GB) TOTAL / PITCHING / HITTING (Age Index)
PIT (2nd -3) 78 / 75 / 80 (aging)
BRO (1st -0) 75 / 83 / 70 (beginning to age)
MIL (6th -9) 74 / 74 / 74 (aging hitters)
CHN (8th -16) 73 / 74 / 72
PHI (7th -12) 72 / 73 / 72 (aging)
CIN (5th -9) 71 / 74 / 70
STL (4th -8) 69 / 76 / 65
NYN (3rd -7) 67 / 63 / 71
Averages
AL Pitching 73.7 Hitting 71.7 Overall 72.5
NL Pitching 71.8 Hitting 70.3 Overall 70.9
:cool:
JJL Team Profiles 6/1/1981
February 03, 2010 at 06:26AM View BBCode
Credit for the formula and descriptions go to cdunn3I applied the rules to our league.
------------------------------------------------------------
This index has some correlation to how a team
will perform in a season, but it is not
conclusive. Injuries,trades,roster changes,
ABE's whims,and manager preferences will all factor in.
Also Only overall ratings are considered.
Players on ML rosters are considered.
If all 25 were A+ overall, the rating
would be 100. If all B+ it would be
70, all B 60, etc. For pitchers, relievers
are weighted at 1/3 of starters. For
hitters, bench players are weighted at
1/3 of starters vs. RHP.
Age Index - considering SP, Closer, and Regulars vs RHP
22 is very young, 34 is very old
(Note all reported values below are rounded to the nearest whole number)
AL (Current Standings) TOTAL / PITCHING / HITTING (Age Index)
Det (1st -0) 76 / 81 / 74 (aging)
Was(3rd -16) 73 / 76 / 72 (aging pitching)
NYA (2nd -14) 73 / 76 / 71 (aging)
CLE (4th -16) 72 / 74 / 72 (aging)
KC (6th -21) 71 / 70 / 72 (young)
BOS (5th -19) 70 / 67 / 72
BAL (7th -24) 68 / 67 / 69 (aging)
OAK (8th -34) 63 / 66 / 62 (very young pitching)
NL (Current Standings -GB) TOTAL / PITCHING / HITTING (Age Index)
PIT (2nd -3) 78 / 75 / 80 (aging)
BRO (1st -0) 75 / 83 / 70 (beginning to age)
MIL (6th -9) 74 / 74 / 74 (aging hitters)
CHN (8th -16) 73 / 74 / 72
PHI (7th -12) 72 / 73 / 72 (aging)
CIN (5th -9) 71 / 74 / 70
STL (4th -8) 69 / 76 / 65
NYN (3rd -7) 67 / 63 / 71
Averages
AL Pitching 73.7 Hitting 71.7 Overall 72.5
NL Pitching 71.8 Hitting 70.3 Overall 70.9
:cool:
zoom
February 03, 2010 at 06:32AM View BBCode
And I did account for guys on the DL who would normally be starters, by the way
Mclovin
February 05, 2010 at 01:50AM View formatted
You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
Nice work zoom! I love this kind of stuff! Keep it up in the future if you can make the time.
haus2424
February 05, 2010 at 03:54AM View BBCode
i like the numbers too, thanks keep it up if you can
Nestor
Could the formula be applied separately to contact, power, speed, velocity and control and the individual results weighted before being recombined into an overall figure, to take into account the relative importance of power, speed and control? Or is that reflected in the overall ratings anyway?
If feasible, what weighting to apply in each case would be the next question, I suppose.
Could you post the formula itself?
February 05, 2010 at 01:35PM View BBCode
Yes, very interesting. Thanks for putting them together.Could the formula be applied separately to contact, power, speed, velocity and control and the individual results weighted before being recombined into an overall figure, to take into account the relative importance of power, speed and control? Or is that reflected in the overall ratings anyway?
If feasible, what weighting to apply in each case would be the next question, I suppose.
Could you post the formula itself?
zoom
http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Aqbjyp7xVPbxdGVNekhvd0tUN19RTTVrSXlsU29obnc&hl=en
Basically, I coded the spreadsheet to multiply 3 times the overall ranking score for Starters, the closer, and guys in the R.H. lineup so that the backups would only have 1/3 of the weight. Then I basically averaged the whole team. I also did a separate average for hitters and pitchers. The age index is stuck in there too and averages the offseason ages.
Adding in the Contact and Power numbers, etc would be nice, but I can't directly download those numbers to Excel so I would have to type all of them in manually. Plus, how much weight should be applied to Power, Weight, and Speed, respectively? If there was consensus on that, it could definitely be done, it would just take some time.
Zoom
February 05, 2010 at 02:27PM View BBCode
Sure, I will post the Excel spreadsheet on my google docs accounthttp://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Aqbjyp7xVPbxdGVNekhvd0tUN19RTTVrSXlsU29obnc&hl=en
Basically, I coded the spreadsheet to multiply 3 times the overall ranking score for Starters, the closer, and guys in the R.H. lineup so that the backups would only have 1/3 of the weight. Then I basically averaged the whole team. I also did a separate average for hitters and pitchers. The age index is stuck in there too and averages the offseason ages.
Adding in the Contact and Power numbers, etc would be nice, but I can't directly download those numbers to Excel so I would have to type all of them in manually. Plus, how much weight should be applied to Power, Weight, and Speed, respectively? If there was consensus on that, it could definitely be done, it would just take some time.
Zoom
Pages: 1